SUEZ
Developer, EPC contractor, operator in the MENA Water Review project register.
At a glance
- Recorded as
- Developer, EPC contractor, Operator
- Projects in the register
- 11 (5 as developer; 7 as EPC contractor; 6 as operator)
- Largest project by recorded value
- Aqaba–Amman Desalination & Conveyance (AAWDC), US$6.0 bn
- Website
- suez.com/en
Projects
| Project | Country | Role recorded | Stage | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Alexandria Sludge Treatment Unit | Egypt | EPC contractor | Operational | US$115 m |
| Aqaba–Amman Desalination & Conveyance (AAWDC) | Jordan | Developer, EPC contractor, Operator | Under construction | US$6.0 bn |
| As-Samra Wastewater Treatment Plant | Jordan | Developer, EPC contractor | Operational | — |
| Disi Water Conveyance (BOT) | Jordan | Operator | Operational | US$988 m |
| Tripoli Wastewater Treatment Plant | Lebanon | EPC contractor | Operational | US$95 m |
| Zahle Wastewater Treatment Plant | Lebanon | Developer, EPC contractor | Operational | US$33 m |
| Barka 4 IWP | Oman | Developer, EPC contractor, Operator | Operational | — |
| Muscat and Sharqiyah Water and Wastewater Services Partnership (Cluster 1) | Oman | EPC contractor | Awarded | — |
| ONAS Southern Sanitation Concession | Tunisia | Developer, Operator | Operational | US$216 m |
| Sfax Nord Wastewater Plant | Tunisia | Operator | Operational | — |
| Sfax Sud Wastewater Plant | Tunisia | Operator | Operational | — |
Built from the MENA Water Review project register; roles as recorded; not a ranking.
Notes
What this page counts. The developer and EPC contractor roles come from two places: the winners recorded in the contract awards log, on the same basis as the track-record table on the major projects page (for a PPP, BOT, BOO or independent water, power or sewage project the developer or sponsor consortium; for an EPC or works contract the main contractor), and the names in the register’s own Developer and Contractor columns, which also include the EPC contractor a developer appointed. Operator and consultant roles are read from the register’s Operator and Consultant columns, so an operating company set up for one plant, or a public body, is not counted as the firm. A developer, contractor or operator named on a project still at the planning or tender stage is not counted (a consultant is, as it is appointed first), and equipment suppliers and subcontractors are left out.
Values. The value is the cost of the whole project as the register records it, not the firm’s share or revenue, and a consortium project is shown in full for each member. A dash means no published value. The register is a list of major schemes and of the awards the site has logged, so a firm’s page is a track record across what the site follows, not a market census and not a complete record of the firm.
Names counted together. The register counts these spellings and group companies as this firm: Disi Amman Operation Maintenance LLC. The evidence for each merge is kept with the register.
Project companies counted under this firm. Where the register names this firm as an owner of the company that operates or holds the concession, that role is credited here: Samra Plant Company; Samra Plant Operation; Societe de Concession d'Assainissement du Sud Tunisien. The register cell that names the owners is kept with the register.
Website link. The link goes to the firm’s homepage. The firm’s terms page (https://www.suez.com/en/general-terms-of-use) was read on 20 October 2026 and says nothing about linking to the site. It is an editorial link and not an endorsement.
Not on this page. No logo, no revenue, no ranking and no ownership line. Where the same name belongs to a group, this page does not follow the group’s other companies unless the register does.